Showing 253–261 of 420 results

  • The Reason Behind the Failing State of Somalia

    $35.00

    Paper Instructions: SOC300: Sociology of Developing Countries
    Written Assignment: The Reasons Behind Failed States
    Use the Internet to research one developing nation of your choice (Somalia). Your research should include an examination of the effects that issues such as bad governance, civil war and corruption have on the creation of states that have failed. Include in your research the articles from the discussion questions as well as the material covered by the Webtext and lectures in Weeks 1 through 8.

    Write a 6 to 8 page research paper in which you:

    1. Identify the factors that contribute to a state’s failure to deliver good governance to its people. Support your response with concrete examples of each of the results that you have cited.
    2. Analyze why the specific actions taken by the leadership of the selected country have failed.
    3. Discuss the prospects for success in the selected country and support your response with examples.
    4. Use at least eight (8) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia, blogs, and other nonacademic websites do not qualify as academic resources. Approval of resources is at the instructor’s discretion.

    Background Information
    (1) In the past, the rising and falling of states was considered an obvious and rampant issue affecting the different system guiding the states.
    (2) Among the top ten failed states in the world, Somalia is the top failed state with a long record and years being a failed states.
    This paper will mainly focus on Somalia as a failed states and articulate the different dynamics surround Somalia within its states

    Download File

  • President John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address Assignment

    $12.50

    Hum 111 Week 8 Dqs

    DQ-1
    •       Using your favorite Internet search engine, search for President John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address. Watch, read, and listen to the media presented on President John F. Kennedy’s inaugural address. In his speech,President Kennedy uses means of persuasion to win over his supporters and those who were possibly less than thrilled with his election. Suppose you opposed President Kennedy’s ideas and wanted to find fault with his speech. What steps would you take to evaluate his arguments?

    DQ-2
    •       What are some examples of errors that affect truth and validity? Summarize the steps you would take to evaluate arguments and overcome any errors in truth or validity that they may contain.

    DQ-3
    •       When oversimplifying, complex matters may be misrepresented and distorted. How can you find and overcome oversimplifications in your arguments?

    Download File

  • Autobiographical Psychosocial History

    $10.00

    PSY/201 Final Project: Autobiographical Psychosocial History

    Choose five concepts from any of those covered in Weeks One through Nine.

    Write a paper of at least 750 words in which you explain how your five chosen concepts apply to or affected your development in life.

    For example, you might choose the concept of parenting styles from Week Five and describe how your parentsäó» parenting style affected you, or you could choose to describe how you parent your own children.

    Submit your work as a Microsoft Word attachment to your Assignment Section

    Additional Resources from the Center for Writing Excellence

    Download File

  • The Similarities and differences between a representative and direct democracy

    $12.50

    Similarities and differences between a representative and direct democracy
    Compare (similarities and differences) and contrast (only differences) key themes and issues in two different government types. Make sure that your essay contains a minimum of 5 paragraphs with three to five complete sentences for intro/conclusion and five to seven seven sentences per body paragraphs.

    3 pages

    Download File

  • What inspired the Red Scare of 1919-1920

    $5.00

    What inspired the Red Scare of 1919-1920? Was the threat real or imagined?

    1 Page

    Download File

  • Frankenstein or the Modern Prometheus

    $15.00

    Review of Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus (1818) Written by Walter Scott

    For this assignment you will write your evaluation. You are required to submit only your final draft for this assignment (though we encourage all students to take advantage of the additional feedback a draft can provide). Use the grader’s feedback and the rubric to make revisions to your draft before submitting the final. Your second draft will be graded.

    Now that you have completed Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, you are in a good position to consider what critics have written about the novel. You will need a total of two critiques (also known as critical analysis) for this assignment.

    First, use the selection of links below to locate a critical analysis written about the 1818 version of Mary Shelley’s novel. You may focus most of your attention on this first critique.

    Choose from among these sources:

    ü ipl2 Literary Criticism collection: If you use this site, you must choose from the first seven critiques listed as the final two are not scholarly: ( http://www.ipl.org/div/litcrit/bin/litcrit.out.pl?ti=fra-63

    ü Professor Sherry Ginn’s critique:1 http://www.clas.ufl.edu/ipsa/2003/ginn.html

    ü Professor Naomi Hetherington’s critique: http://knarf.english.upenn.edu/Articles/hether.html

    The questions in the study guides should have helped you evaluate this criticism in your head. Now it’s time to write it down!

    Your evaluation may go more smoothly if you approach the guiding questions in this order:

    1. Evaluate the critic/author:

    Who wrote the criticism you read? What credentials does the author have (education, professional career, other publications, etc.)? (If you are using a credible author, you should be able to find her/his credentials fairly easily)

    1. Find the thesis of the article:

    What is the thesis of the critical article you’ve chosen? What point does the author want to make about Frankenstein?

    1. Evaluate the thesis:

    1 Note: You should avoid reading Ginn’s article too simplistically. A common misperception is that Ginn is arguing in favor of this novel being an autobiography, but if you read her article in full, you will find that this isn’t really the case. If you misinterpret your chosen source, it will affect your own arguments, so please read carefully.

    Do you agree with this thesis? Why or why not? We’ve covered many ideas in the study guides. Can you find points within the guides that support your agreement or disagreement with the critical writer(s)? Look for new supporting information rather than revisiting the same ones the critics have chosen.

    1. Evaluate the support:

    Whether you agree or disagree with the thesis, does the critic provide sufficient research from the text and outside references to make a strong case? What does the article have for support from the text or outside sources? In your opinion, what makes these references valid? Do you feel the author uses this support properly?

    Next, locate a second critique about the novel, and discuss how this second critique agrees and/or disagrees with the first one. For instance, if the first critic argues that Shelley’s writing is juvenile, does the second critic agree with this assessment? If the first critic believes the novel is autobiographical, does the second critic concur? These are just a few examples of how you can include this second critique in order to have a polished, comprehensive Evaluation of your own.

    In addition to addressing each of the evaluative components above, develop so it has a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. You must include an evaluative thesis statement both the introduction and the conclusion. Ensure that each of your claims are supported with valid evidence from the literary criticism you have chosen, the novel, Frankenstein, and/or the study guides.

    Using proper MLA2 style, insert parenthetical citations for all borrowed information in addition to a Works Cited page for Frankenstein and your chosen literary critiques; you are not required to cite the study guides if you use them.

    Download File

  • What court decided the case in the assignment

    $17.50

    MGMT 520 Week 3 Ethics

    1. What court decided the case in the assignment?
    2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment?
    3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis.
    4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress and what tort did the court approve?
    1. According to the case, why didn’t the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims?
    1. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?

    Now, in the library, click the Shepardize button in the top right of the LexisNexis page while on the case. This provides you with all of the cases that have used Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case as precedent since its publication. From the cases listed, pick one, click the link, read the case, and provide the following information.

    1. The name and citation of the
    2. The name of the court that decided the case.
    3. The year of the decision
    4. The facts of the case:
    5. The issue of the case:
    6. The “decision” of the case:
    7. The principle of law the case was used (cited) for in the case:
    Download File

  • How do Government Institutions help to manage business in Nepal

    $5.00

    How do Government Institutions help to manage business in Nepal? Write with examples.

    1 Page

    Download File

  • French and Indian War

    $0.00

    French and Indian War

    Download File