What court decided the case in the assignment


MGMT 520 Week 3 Ethics

  1. What court decided the case in the assignment?
  2. According to the case, what must a party establish to prevail on a motion for summary judgment?
  3. Briefly state the facts of this case, using the information found in the case in LexisNexis.
  4. According to the case, why was this not a case of negligent infliction of emotional distress and what tort did the court approve?
  1. According to the case, why didn’t the court approve summary judgment for product liability claims?
  1. Do you agree with this decision? Why or why not?

Now, in the library, click the Shepardize button in the top right of the LexisNexis page while on the case. This provides you with all of the cases that have used Nadel et al. v. Burger King Corp. & Emil, Inc. case as precedent since its publication. From the cases listed, pick one, click the link, read the case, and provide the following information.

  1. The name and citation of the
  2. The name of the court that decided the case.
  3. The year of the decision
  4. The facts of the case:
  5. The issue of the case:
  6. The “decision” of the case:
  7. The principle of law the case was used (cited) for in the case: