Showing 136–144 of 420 results

  • Bilateral relations between Australia and one Asian country (India)

    $25.00

    Discuss bilateral relations between Australia and one Asian country. Your answer must explain changes in those relations since World War II, and the principal reasons for such changes. For this topic you must choose to discuss bilateral relations with China, or Japan, or Indonesia, or India.

    Pages: 7, double spaced

  • The White Revolution in Iran

    $7.00

    In 500 words, discuss the White Revolution in Iran. Why did it occur, what did it achieve, and how is it related to the Iranian Revolution of 1979?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Revolution
    compare to….
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_Revolution

  • Compare and contrast the 1967 War (between Israel and Egypt, Jordan, and Syria) and the October, or Yom Kippur,

    $7.00

    In 500 words, compare and contrast the 1967 War (between Israel and Egypt, Jordan, and Syria) and the October, or Yom Kippur, War in 1973 (between Israel and Egypt.) What were the causes of each and what were their outcomes and consequences?

  • Amendments to United States Constitution

    $10.00

    The 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution have the greatest impact upon the criminal justice system than any of the other admendments within the botht he federal and state judicial and law enforcement systems.

    The 4th Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seiqures, shall not be violatged, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

    The 5th Amendment states, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militias, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, not be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public us, without just compensation.”

    The 6th Amendment states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been preciously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.”

    The 8th Amendment states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

    The 14th Amendment states, “Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

    Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

    Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

    Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

    Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

    Assignment

    Prepare a written analysis of the impact of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and the 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution in processing offenders through the criminal justice system by listing your opinions of how these amendments have a daily impact upon the criminal justice system’s due process processing of an offender from the initial stages of the investigation to the sentencing after the trial. Due process is basically the process of the criminal justice system which protects the defendant’s and the victim’s rights. Be sure to back up your opinions with facts and research. Explain the concept of due process as applied to the U.S. Constitution. Include the following:

    • What due process rights are contained in the U.S. Constitution? Give examples.
    • What is procedural due process, and why does it exist?
    • Do you think any of these rights should be revoked at any time? Which ones?
    • What made you choose those?
    • To what extent does procedural due process hinder or strengthen the criminal justice system?

      The 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th and 14th Amendments to the United States Constitution have the greatest impact upon the criminal justice system than any of the other admendments within the botht he federal and state judicial and law enforcement systems.

      The 4th Amendment states, “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects, against unreasonable searches and seiqures, shall not be violatged, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

      The 5th Amendment states, “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militias, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, not be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public us, without just compensation.”

      The 6th Amendment states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been preciously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation to be confronted with the witnesses against him to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defence.”

      The 8th Amendment states, “Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

      The 14th Amendment states, “Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

      Section 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.

      Section 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

      Section 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.

      Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

      Assignment

      Prepare a written analysis of the impact of the 4th, 5th, 6th, 8th, and the 14th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution in processing offenders through the criminal justice system by listing your opinions of how these amendments have a daily impact upon the criminal justice system’s due process processing of an offender from the initial stages of the investigation to the sentencing after the trial. Due process is basically the process of the criminal justice system which protects the defendant’s and the victim’s rights. Be sure to back up your opinions with facts and research. Explain the concept of due process as applied to the U.S. Constitution. Include the following:

      • What due process rights are contained in the U.S. Constitution? Give examples.
      • What is procedural due process, and why does it exist?
      • Do you think any of these rights should be revoked at any time? Which ones?
      • What made you choose those?
      • To what extent does procedural due process hinder or strengthen the criminal justice system?
  • Why is it so difficult for the two major political parties in Congress to articulate a coherent policy agenda

    $15.00

    POL 210-06609

                                                          ESSAY QUESTION THREE

    GROUND RULES: Your response to the question below should be 3-4 pages in length (double-spaced, using regular 12 point font and margins). This is an open-book take-home exam, so you should use the assigned readings and your notes to formulate your response to the question. Since this is an exam, however, you are on your honor not to discuss the content of your response with classmates. The exam is due in class on Wednesday, April 2nd. Any exam received after class will be marked down one grade (e.g., A to A-) for each additional calendar day the exam is late. In most cases, extension of the deadline will only be granted with an appropriately documented personal or family emergency. If you anticipate a problem with the deadline, please let me know immediately.

    HELPFUL HINTS: Your exam should use the ideas and events presented in the readings and in class to develop a focused and structured response to the question. Simply recounting history during relevant periods will be insufficient. You need to use that history to make broader arguments about key ideas and concepts, as dictated by the question. If you quote particular readings, you do not need to give a formal footnote, but include relevant page numbers in parentheses after the quote. Please spell-check your response and include page numbers on your document.

    Please answer BOTH parts A and B of the following question in your essay:

    1. Why is it so difficult for the two major political parties in Congress to articulate a coherent policy agenda?
    2. Is there anything that Congressional leaders can do to make their legislative body run more efficiently?
  • THE HOLOCAUST IN HISTORY AND IN MEMORY- JEWS Final Decisions to kill all jews

    $25.00

    The Washington MILE: Essay Assignment

    Description:

    During our stay in Washington, we saw and experienced a number of things that spoke to the larger ‘American experience’ in the world. From the monuments that we visited, to the museums, to the Canadian embassy to the United States, and the various governmental and cultural sites that we toured, you get a sense of what America regards as its natural ‘place in the world.’ Now it is your turn to reflect more deeply on one of those experiences.

    You are free to choose a topic that you find interesting and worthy of further exploration, but it should be relevant (if even tangentially) to our visit to Washington. Suggested topics are:

    THE HOLOCAUST IN HISTORY AND IN MEMORY- JEWS Final Decisions to kill all jews

    I am open to a creative interpretation of any of these themes, or a theme not listed here, but try as best as you can to keep it relatively on topic.

    Structure, Format and Research

    I would like to see a clear thesis statement or question in the opening paragraph of your work. (This lets the reader understand what the writer will be exploring). Remember to keep the rest of the paper focused on this initial thesis statement or question.

    The paper should be about 6-7 pages in length, double spaced, 12 pt. font. That is about 1600-1800 words. You should have 7 sources for the final paper. I would suggest using websites and Seneca Library’s database when looking for sources. Sources should be specific and relevant to your research. Do not use general, encyclopaedic sources like Wikipedia and online encyclopaedias- they are useful for general research, but shouldn’t be cited in your paper. These sources will not be counted towards your ten sources. (Wikipedia is a great place to start your research, but don’t use that type of source in your citations).

    You should properly cite all of the websites, and articles that you use in your research. I don’t mind if a majority of your sources are websites, but I would like to see a journal article, where possible, in your mix of sources. I would also like you to footnote all of your citations as you write. Please email me or see me anytime if you have any questions on this.

    Plagiarism:

    DO NOT simply cut and paste material from websites into your paper. This constitutes plagiarism, which is a serious academic offense. Plagiarism will result in a ZERO on this paper, at the very least. Please see Seneca’s Policy on Plagiarism which is included in the course addendum. Also, see me if you have any questions about what does, and does not, constitute plagiarism.

    Grading Rubric:

    I will be grading the paper based on the quality of writing and research. Roughly speaking, the breakdown will be:

    Research: 25% (Quality of sources used in the paper)

    Writing Structure: 40% (Have you provided a clear thesis? Does the paper speak directly to that paper?)

    Spelling, Grammar and Style: 20% (Is the writing clean and error free?)

    Citations: 15% (Are websites and articles properly cited?)

  • The Criminal Justice Procedure Essay

    $7.00

    You have been a federal narcotics agent with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) for 5 years. Your unit’s arrest record is outstanding, and you are considered to be the upcoming “hot cop,” and maybe one day, the future SAC (Special Agent in Charge) in a large city. Because of your record and ambition, your supervisor has tasked you with giving a presentation to the DEA academy recruits on the criminal justice process for your jurisdiction. You understand that each federal jurisdiction is the same with only a few small differences in their procedures, but you will give the class based upon jurisdiction in which you live (e.g., in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia). Someone else will do the PowerPoint slides for you once you have written your paper. Your supervisor wants you to take the case of Jimmy Abshire, who is a local drug dealer you legally arrested a few days ago with 2 kilos of cocaine, 14 kilos of marijuana, 2 pistols, 1 sub-machinegun, and $67,000 in cash. You will use Abshire’s case as an example for your class. You just got in a check of his DNA, which links him back to a sexual assault that took place about a year ago, and the link places him at the sexual assault alone with the victim. Make sure that your paper discusses the following:

    • Your supervisor wants you to explain to the class each step in the criminal justice procedure (initial appearance, Miranda rights, bail hearings, preliminary hearing, pretrial hearing, trial, sentencing, etc.). At a minimum, explain which step comes in which order, and explain what happens in the steps.
    • What charges do you think that the drug dealer should have (State or Federal)?
    • When does the “right to counsel” attach to the defendant? Name and briefly explain 3 constitutional rights that the defendant has during and prior to trial. Also, you will want to address whether the defendant has a right to appeal his conviction if he is convicted, and to which court(s).
    • What is the role of the judiciary in this case? The role of U.S. Attorney’s office? The role of your office?
    • What is the legal analysis of the DNA evidence and the other real evidence that you have collected?
    • Remember that your paper (which your supervisor will review) is to serve as the basis of your class, so you want it to be complete and accurate.

      You have been a federal narcotics agent with the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) for 5 years. Your unit’s arrest record is outstanding, and you are considered to be the upcoming “hot cop,” and maybe one day, the future SAC (Special Agent in Charge) in a large city. Because of your record and ambition, your supervisor has tasked you with giving a presentation to the DEA academy recruits on the criminal justice process for your jurisdiction. You understand that each federal jurisdiction is the same with only a few small differences in their procedures, but you will give the class based upon jurisdiction in which you live (e.g., in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia). Someone else will do the PowerPoint slides for you once you have written your paper. Your supervisor wants you to take the case of Jimmy Abshire, who is a local drug dealer you legally arrested a few days ago with 2 kilos of cocaine, 14 kilos of marijuana, 2 pistols, 1 sub-machinegun, and $67,000 in cash. You will use Abshire’s case as an example for your class. You just got in a check of his DNA, which links him back to a sexual assault that took place about a year ago, and the link places him at the sexual assault alone with the victim. Make sure that your paper discusses the following:

      • Your supervisor wants you to explain to the class each step in the criminal justice procedure (initial appearance, Miranda rights, bail hearings, preliminary hearing, pretrial hearing, trial, sentencing, etc.). At a minimum, explain which step comes in which order, and explain what happens in the steps.
      • What charges do you think that the drug dealer should have (State or Federal)?
      • When does the “right to counsel” attach to the defendant? Name and briefly explain 3 constitutional rights that the defendant has during and prior to trial. Also, you will want to address whether the defendant has a right to appeal his conviction if he is convicted, and to which court(s).
      • What is the role of the judiciary in this case? The role of U.S. Attorney’s office? The role of your office?
      • What is the legal analysis of the DNA evidence and the other real evidence that you have collected?
      • Remember that your paper (which your supervisor will review) is to serve as the basis of your class, so you want it to be complete and accurate.
  • Western involvement in the Middle East as a result of the decision by the Ottoman Empire

    $7.50
    1. Discuss Western involvement in the Middle East as a result of the decision by the Ottoman Empire to enter World War I as allies of Germany. What were the long-term consequences of this involvement?
    2. What were the similarities and differences between the adaptation to modern times between the rise of modern Turkey, modern Saudi Arabia, and modern Iran?
  • Main Contentions of the Wahhabi Movement and other Questions

    $5.00

    Short Answer Questions
    Answer all five (5) of the Short Answer Questions. Each question should be answered in a short paragraph of at least 100 words.

    1. Briefly describe the main contentions of the Wahhabi movement and the two main ways this movement differed from other revivalist movements.
    2. What are the origins of the American University in Beirut, and what are its connections to the rise of Arab nationalism?
    3. Who were the Young Turks, and what did they do?
    4. How did the neorevivalist Muslim Brotherhood (Jamaat al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin) and Islamic Society (Jamaat-i-Islami) regard the Western concept of separation of church and state?
    5. What were six principles of reform in Turkey known as Ataturk’s “six arrows”? Which of these do you think had the potential to clash with traditional Islamic beliefs?

    Use wikipedia.com to answer these questions. You can provide the sources from the bottom of the wikipedia page. This assignment is simple: ANSWER THE QUESTION. There are countless websites with the answers to these questions. This needs to be done right the first time.