Assignment: Michael Scriven’s paper, “Evaluating Evaluations: A Meta-Evaluation Checklist” Reaction

Please read Michael Scriven’s paper, “Evaluating Evaluations: A Meta-Evaluation Checklist” (http://michaelscriven.info/images/EVALUATING_EVALUATIONS_8.16.11.pdf).
Post your thoughts and reactions about Scriven’s ideas about what he states is important in metaevaluation. After this course, what insights have you gained that would lead you to arrange, or not arrange, the factors differently? Why?
Review two peers’ entries, and comment on how their description illustrates development of their critical thinking skills.

In addition to answering the discussion question, before the end of the week, begin commenting on at least 2 of your peers’ responses to the discussion question. You can ask technical questions or respond generally to the overall experience. Be objective, clear, and concise. Always use constructive language, even in criticism, to work toward the goal of positive progress. All comments should also be posted to the appropriate topic in this Discussion Area.

All written assignments and responses should follow APA rules for attributing sources.

1 Page

APA – 1 Reference