Showing 469–477 of 769 results

  • Teen Obesity Paper

    $7.50

    As this is the first of three research papers that will be written for the class, and as many of you may not have written a research paper for several years, if ever, we will begin the process as a class.  Together, we will have several subjects, and you will have to find different subtopics within the subject that we will begin to research as a class, and the subtopics would be within either Food or Self-Image.  Since everyone has gone through the intro to the research process, it will be up to the individual student to find at least one additional source on his or her own.  The student will then assemble all of the materials to create a well-written research paper.  Feel free to contact me if you should encounter any trouble.

    Pages: 4, double spaced

    Citation: MLA

    Download File

  • Eligibility to Donate an Organ

    $10.00

    PHIL 1165: Moral and Social Problems in Healthcare Final Paper

    Format and Submission
    Length: 1600-2000 words
    Spacing: Single or Double
    Font size: 11-12

    Assignment
    The final paper assignment requires you to engage in substantive philosophical research and defend a philosophical thesis. You may choose any topic in the area of Bioethics. If you choose a topic that was already covered in class, you must engage critically with at least one academic, philosophical reading that was not covered in class.

    Requirements
    The main requirement of this assignment is that you defend your own view about some philosophical issue while at the same time charitably but critically engaging with arguments defending some alternative.
    Every paper should have the following components:

    1. Introduction
    The introduction of your paper should be succinct but accomplish the following:

    1. Provide context for the thesis under discussion. Why is the thesis you are defending important or relevant? Why should a reader care to hear about the defense of a thesis on your topic?
    2. Introduce the reader to your thesis. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should know what precisely will be defended in the paper.
    3. Introduce the reader to the structure of the paper. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should have an idea of how the paper will be structured. In doing so, you will also be introducing the reader to what ideas/theses you’ll be arguing against in the paper since you can’t spell out the structure without mentioning that you’ll be engaging critically with alternative views.

    2. Conclusion
    The conclusion of your paper should succinctly sum up what you have accomplished in your paper.

    3. Exegesis of dissenting view(s)
    These papers require you to critically engage with arguments for theses that are inconsistent with your own. Before explaining what is wrong with any view, you must precisely, concisely, and charitably explain those arguments.

    4. Critical evaluation of dissenting view(s)
    Once you have fairly explained the alternatives to your own view, you must critically evaluate them using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence)

    5. Works cited
    Choose a professional format that you like. If you have no preference, I would choose something like (Author Date) with full entries in the bibliography. I recommend that you use a tool like Zotero or Endnote for building bibliographies and for citing sources.

    6. Thesis defense
    You must provide a substantive, cogent defense of your own view using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence).

    7. Title
    Your paper should have a descriptive and professional sounding title.

    8. Section headings
    Your paper should be divided into distinct sections with useful section titles.
    Potential Topics
    1. ELT Distribution

    • Organ Transplantation Policy
    • Organ Donation Ethics
    • What Counts a Disease
    • Voluntary Health-Risk Behavior

    2. Reproduction Ethics

    • Commercial Surrogacy
    • Parental Licensing
    • Abortion
    • Moral Status of the Fetus
    • Fatherhood and Abortion Decisions
    • Choosing Children

    3. Biomedical Enhancement and Cloning

    • PEDs and Sports
    • Cognitive Enhancement
    • Moral Enhancement
    • Cloning for Organs

    4. Research Ethics

    • Animal experimentation
    • Human Experimentation
    • Economic Justice and Experimentation
    • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals

    5. Healthcare Policy

    • Universal Healthcare
    • Obligations to the Worst-Off and Justice

    6. Personal Health Decisions

    • Active vs. Passive
    • Physician Assisted Suicide
    • Genetic Screening

    7. Patient’s Rights

    • Informed Consent
    • Autonomy
    Download File

  • Pharmaceutically Assisted Suicide and the Pharmacist’s Right to Know

    $10.00

    PHIL 1165: Moral and Social Problems in Healthcare Final Paper

    Format and Submission
    Length: 1600-2000 words
    Spacing: Single or Double
    Font size: 11-12

    Assignment
    The final paper assignment requires you to engage in substantive philosophical research and defend a philosophical thesis. You may choose any topic in the area of Bioethics. If you choose a topic that was already covered in class, you must engage critically with at least one academic, philosophical reading that was not covered in class.

    Requirements
    The main requirement of this assignment is that you defend your own view about some philosophical issue while at the same time charitably but critically engaging with arguments defending some alternative.
    Every paper should have the following components:

    1. Introduction
    The introduction of your paper should be succinct but accomplish the following:

    1. Provide context for the thesis under discussion. Why is the thesis you are defending important or relevant? Why should a reader care to hear about the defense of a thesis on your topic?
    2. Introduce the reader to your thesis. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should know what precisely will be defended in the paper.
    3. Introduce the reader to the structure of the paper. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should have an idea of how the paper will be structured. In doing so, you will also be introducing the reader to what ideas/theses you’ll be arguing against in the paper since you can’t spell out the structure without mentioning that you’ll be engaging critically with alternative views.

    2. Conclusion
    The conclusion of your paper should succinctly sum up what you have accomplished in your paper.

    3. Exegesis of dissenting view(s)
    These papers require you to critically engage with arguments for theses that are inconsistent with your own. Before explaining what is wrong with any view, you must precisely, concisely, and charitably explain those arguments.

    4. Critical evaluation of dissenting view(s)
    Once you have fairly explained the alternatives to your own view, you must critically evaluate them using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence)

    5. Works cited
    Choose a professional format that you like. If you have no preference, I would choose something like (Author Date) with full entries in the bibliography. I recommend that you use a tool like Zotero or Endnote for building bibliographies and for citing sources.

    6. Thesis defense
    You must provide a substantive, cogent defense of your own view using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence).

    7. Title
    Your paper should have a descriptive and professional sounding title.

    8. Section headings
    Your paper should be divided into distinct sections with useful section titles.
    Potential Topics
    1. ELT Distribution

    • Organ Transplantation Policy
    • Organ Donation Ethics
    • What Counts a Disease
    • Voluntary Health-Risk Behavior

    2. Reproduction Ethics

    • Commercial Surrogacy
    • Parental Licensing
    • Abortion
    • Moral Status of the Fetus
    • Fatherhood and Abortion Decisions
    • Choosing Children

    3. Biomedical Enhancement and Cloning

    • PEDs and Sports
    • Cognitive Enhancement
    • Moral Enhancement
    • Cloning for Organs

    4. Research Ethics

    • Animal experimentation
    • Human Experimentation
    • Economic Justice and Experimentation
    • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals

    5. Healthcare Policy

    • Universal Healthcare
    • Obligations to the Worst-Off and Justice

    6. Personal Health Decisions

    • Active vs. Passive
    • Physician Assisted Suicide
    • Genetic Screening

    7. Patient’s Rights

    • Informed Consent
    • Autonomy
    Download File

  • Opting-out: A fair and improved policy for organ transplantation

    $10.00

    PHIL 1165: Moral and Social Problems in Healthcare Final Paper

    Format and Submission
    Length: 1600-2000 words
    Spacing: Single or Double
    Font size: 11-12

    Assignment
    The final paper assignment requires you to engage in substantive philosophical research and defend a philosophical thesis. You may choose any topic in the area of Bioethics. If you choose a topic that was already covered in class, you must engage critically with at least one academic, philosophical reading that was not covered in class.

    Requirements
    The main requirement of this assignment is that you defend your own view about some philosophical issue while at the same time charitably but critically engaging with arguments defending some alternative.
    Every paper should have the following components:

    1. Introduction
    The introduction of your paper should be succinct but accomplish the following:

    1. Provide context for the thesis under discussion. Why is the thesis you are defending important or relevant? Why should a reader care to hear about the defense of a thesis on your topic?
    2. Introduce the reader to your thesis. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should know what precisely will be defended in the paper.
    3. Introduce the reader to the structure of the paper. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should have an idea of how the paper will be structured. In doing so, you will also be introducing the reader to what ideas/theses you’ll be arguing against in the paper since you can’t spell out the structure without mentioning that you’ll be engaging critically with alternative views.

    2. Conclusion
    The conclusion of your paper should succinctly sum up what you have accomplished in your paper.

    3. Exegesis of dissenting view(s)
    These papers require you to critically engage with arguments for theses that are inconsistent with your own. Before explaining what is wrong with any view, you must precisely, concisely, and charitably explain those arguments.

    4. Critical evaluation of dissenting view(s)
    Once you have fairly explained the alternatives to your own view, you must critically evaluate them using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence)

    5. Works cited
    Choose a professional format that you like. If you have no preference, I would choose something like (Author Date) with full entries in the bibliography. I recommend that you use a tool like Zotero or Endnote for building bibliographies and for citing sources.

    6. Thesis defense
    You must provide a substantive, cogent defense of your own view using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence).

    7. Title
    Your paper should have a descriptive and professional sounding title.

    8. Section headings
    Your paper should be divided into distinct sections with useful section titles.
    Potential Topics
    1. ELT Distribution

    • Organ Transplantation Policy
    • Organ Donation Ethics
    • What Counts a Disease
    • Voluntary Health-Risk Behavior

    2. Reproduction Ethics

    • Commercial Surrogacy
    • Parental Licensing
    • Abortion
    • Moral Status of the Fetus
    • Fatherhood and Abortion Decisions
    • Choosing Children

    3. Biomedical Enhancement and Cloning

    • PEDs and Sports
    • Cognitive Enhancement
    • Moral Enhancement
    • Cloning for Organs

    4. Research Ethics

    • Animal experimentation
    • Human Experimentation
    • Economic Justice and Experimentation
    • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals

    5. Healthcare Policy

    • Universal Healthcare
    • Obligations to the Worst-Off and Justice

    6. Personal Health Decisions

    • Active vs. Passive
    • Physician Assisted Suicide
    • Genetic Screening

    7. Patient’s Rights

    • Informed Consent
    • Autonomy
    Download File

  • My Nursing Ethics: Nrs-437v Ethical Dimension making in health care

    $10.00

    Nrs-437v Ethical Dimension making in health care

    After reading the Topic 1 materials, complete the questionnaire titled, “My Nursing Ethic.”

    Complete the questions below:

    • PASSION: Why am I here?
    • MOTIVATION: What moves me to act?
    • INSPIRATION: What keeps me in motion?
    • LOYALTY: Whom do I serve?

    Using the reading and the questionnaire, write a paper of 750-1,000 words in which you describe your professional moral compass. As you write your paper, include the following:

    What personal, cultural, and spiritual values contribute to your worldview and philosophy of nursing? How do these values shape or influence your nursing practice?

    Define values, morals, and ethics in the context of your obligation to nursing practice. Explain how your personal values, philosophy, and worldview may conflict with your obligation to practice, creating an ethical dilemma.

    Reflect and share your own personal thoughts regarding the morals and ethical dilemmas you may face in the health care field. How do your personal views affect your behavior and your decision making?

    Do not be concerned with the use of ethical terminology for this paper.

    Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

    This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

    Download File

  • MEDICAL CARE FOR AN INCREASING OBESE POPULATION

    $5.00

    HCS 440 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Health Care Reform Project, Part I

    Learning Team Assignment: Health Care Reform Project, Part I

    Resource: Health Care Reform Project, Part 1 grading criteria on the student website.

    Select a current health care economic issue, such as managed care, health care spending, prescription drugs, the influence of current legislation on health care, medical care for an aging population, or the influence of illegal immigrants on health care economics in the United States.

    Write a 1,050- to 1,750-word paper in which you address the following:
    Describe the issue.

    • Perform a literature search on the issue. Find at least three articles and provide a summary of the articles.
    • Research, identify, and describe three possible solutions. The solutions do not need to be extensive, but must represent solutions identified in your research.

    Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

    Download File

  • How Mental Health Act (2005) Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding (DOLS) conflict with European Convention of Human Rights

    $5.00

    Requirements:

    Critically discuss how Mental Health Act (2005) Deprivation of Liberty Safeguarding (DOLS) conflict with European Convention of Human Rights.
    UK social work practice
    You can use Michael Preston-shoot books (making good decision in social work)

    Pages: 4, double spaced

    Citation: N/A

    Download File

  • HCS 440 Week 3 Individual Assignment Health Care Spending Paper

    $10.00

    HCS 440 Week 3 Individual Assignment Health Care Spending Paper

    Individual Assignment: Health Care Spending Paper

    Resource: Health Care Spending Paper grading criteria on the student website.

    Write a 1,250- to 1,750-word paper in which you explain your position on national health care spending in the United States. Include information on the following:

    • The level of current national health care expenditures
    • Whether the spending is too much or not enough
    • Where the nation should add or cut, and why
    • How the public’s health care needs are paid for, such as being financed by various payers, while indicating the percent of total expenditures they represent

    Provide a forecast of the following:

    • The future economic needs of the health care system
    • Why these needs must be addressed
    • How you envision these needs will be financed

    Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

    Download File

  • Health Care Reform Project, Part I (the influence of illegal immigrants on health care economics in the United States)

    $10.00

    HCS 440 Week 2 Learning Team Assignment Health Care Reform Project, Part I

    Learning Team Assignment: Health Care Reform Project, Part I

    Resource: Health Care Reform Project, Part 1 grading criteria on the student website.

    Select a current health care economic issue, such as managed care, health care spending, prescription drugs, the influence of current legislation on health care, medical care for an aging population, or the influence of illegal immigrants on health care economics in the United States.

    Write a 1,050- to 1,750-word paper in which you address the following:

    • Describe the issue.
    • Perform a literature search on the issue. Find at least three articles and provide a summary of the articles.
    • Research, identify, and describe three possible solutions. The solutions do not need to be extensive, but must represent solutions identified in your research.

    Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.

    Download File