Faculty of Business and Law
Assignment Brief
Unit Title: Digital Awareness and Professional Development | |||
Unit Code: | 5S4Z1000(2) | Core: Yes | Level: 4 |
Assignment Title: 1CWK100 – 1 Portfolio 100% | |||
Submission Date: See date on Moodle | Feedback Return Date: See Date on Moodle | ||
Submission Instructions: To be submitted to Turnitin via Moodle | |||
Feedback Return Information: Via Moodle 4 weeks from submission date | |||
Assignment Task and word count : Your task is to develop a digital awareness, personal and professional portfolio. The e-portfolio MUST include a personal strengths profile, a professional social media digital footprint, CV, action plan and evidence that you have reflected on unrealised strengths and set objectives for developing those strengths. (Word count between 1,700 – 2,000 words) | |||
Unit Learning Outcomes Assessed.
1. Identify their personal and professional skills and their social media digital footprint (SMDF) 2. Construct and present strategies for the development of their personal and professional skills and the management of their SMDF. 3. Apply reflective practice to their digital awareness, and their personal and professional development |
Assignment Details and Instructions.
The assessment gives you the opportunity to produce a personal narrative reflecting your own strengths, experiences values, aspirations and skills development and understand the impact of your own professional social media footprint. Assignment: Your task is to develop a portfolio – this must be presented as a portfolio in electronic form. The portfolio MUST include a CV, and evidence that you have reflected on unrealised strengths and set objectives for developing those strengths and identified and developed your social media footprint. Your portfolio will enable you to identify, and evidence, your developing strengths for your next level of study and your future career, and will be based on identifying your current position and reflecting on the next steps and actionable points. You MUST include evidence of considerable engagement with the PPD process and demonstrate areas of development and developments in your professional social media footprint. In your portfolio you should: 1. Demonstrate how you have used your experience to learn about yourself during your first year at university and the contributions and implications of this learning for your future professional development and career choices 2. Clearly identify your personal strengths and areas that you need to develop in relation to your degree programme, your professional development, social media footprint and the expectations of potential employers. 3. Clearly identify appropriate actions that you should take to enhance your unrealised strengths in relation to your university journey as an early career professional and your future career path One way of doing this is to use for the five-step process for PDP planning as set out below:
You should produce you portfolio in electronic form via a program such as Word, PowerPoint, or Pages, and converted to PDF format, you must show you have engaged with the learning materials (20%). It MUST include:
The word limits are approximate and are intended as guidance. It is expected that as a minimum you should submit 1700 words (not including your C.V). The length of the submission has been specified to allow concise but sufficiently detailed submission. Any submission which is longer than the indicated 2000 words is likely to receive a reduced mark on the grounds of ineffective communication. Any submission which is shorter is likely to receive a reduced mark on the grounds of insufficient detail. Detail on how to structure these sections will be covered in the unit sessions.
SUBMISSION GUIDANCE
Format: · Use an appropriate medium to showcase your work (Word, PowerPoint, Pages, Keynote) · Use of MMU Harvard Referencing is essential (A PDF guide link is on Moodle) · Use headings and sub-headings to structure your assignment · Use images and pictures if appropriate. · The portfolio must be convert to, and submitted in, PDF format You will need to upload your PDF to the Turnitin link provided on the unit Moodle site. Your deadline for submission will be under the assessment area of Moodle You will receive marks and feedback on your assessment four weeks after the final deadline, as shown on the Moodle site.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION What you MUST do: · Use MMU Harvard Referencing appropriately and in full, both in the text as citations and listed in full, alphabetically, at the end in a References section · Use grammatically correct formal English. · Proof read your work · Attend supporting tutorials and engage with all material on Moodle · You must discuss your goals with your class Tutor (this will ensure they are appropriate) · You must use your own words · You must read this assignment brief! · You must use British English, not US English. What you MUST NOT do: · Do not use Wikipedia or other inappropriate web sites as reference material · Do not leave portfolio completion until the last day · Do not submit late – see the Late Submission section for details.
LATE SUBMISSION If your submission is after the deadline but within five days of it, your mark will be capped at 40%. You will then be offered the opportunity to re-submit at the next assessment opportunity as determined by the Assessment Board. Please Note: your Tutor cannot grant extensions. If you think you are unable to submit on time due to a health or some other unforeseen issue you must contact the Student Hub and apply through formal channels for Exceptional Factors.
A Good Critical Reflection…
· draws on different academic and professional sources in order to develop your own thinking. You will be expected to reference a minimum of three sources for this piece of work using MMU Harvard Referencing.
Portfolio Feedback You will receive feedback on your submitted work that covers your ability to be critical of information to support your argument, and how you have analysed it in context of your own development. You will also receive written commentary on the academic and professional skills you have further enhanced and developed.
Early Career Professional Skills (PLOs) being assessed or developed/assessed.
This assessment will help you to develop a set of key skills needed by all professionals: 1. Self-awareness – of your own personality, aptitudes, skills and personal development needs 2. Critical Thinking – the ability to identify what you need to improve and to construct, carry out and reflect on a Personal Development Plan to achieve this 3. Demonstrating Values – the ability to identify your personal values and to represent this when you present yourself professionally 4. Communication Skills – the ability to communicate about yourself and your skills professionally and effectively; and to use a creative digital medium to do this 5. Professionalism – the ability to develop employability skills. Intellectual skills At the end of this unit, you should be able to: · identify your personal strengths and weaknesses in relation to your personal development and your degree programme and the expectations of potential employers · work independently and in groups · identify appropriate actions you should take to enhance your personal qualities and competences in relation to your life and your future career. Relevant practical skills At the end of this unit, you will have improved your ability to study effectively and efficiently at undergraduate level. |
Transferable skills At the end of this unit, you will be able to: · Interpret material in an original and evaluative way · Synthesise to form links between concepts and theories producing coherent arguments · Use a variety of information sources in their research and learning activities · Keep effective records of their learning and progress towards personal, academic and career goals. Communication skills At the end of this unit, you will be able to: • Plan, organise and structure work that is coherent, fluent and grammatically accurate • Develop fluency in verbal and written reasoning • Write effectively using academic and business conventions. |
Resources
All resources needed for the assessment cab found on the unit Moodle site. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MARKING CRITERIA
Assessment Attainment Bands
Please see below for the marking criteria setting out what is expected for each level of the assessment. Marks will be allocated accordingly. In line with University guidance, this unit will use STEP marking. Step marking means using a restricted number of marks within the range of 0-100%. All marks would end in 2, 5 or 8 (e.g. 52%, 45%, 88% – the only possible exceptions would be 0% and 100%). The use of step marking shows the extent to which the piece of work meets a specific criterion within a grade range (e.g. 50-59%) The template marking system is detailed after the assessment criteria below. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unit Specification
Course Unit Specification
Course Unit Details and Outline
Course Unit Description
Learning Outcomes
Summative Assessment Please list the components of assessments in expected order of submission.
Learning Activities
Learning Resources The information required in this section can either be typed in in the table below, or a download version of the information from the relevant Talis Aspire area can be appended to this paper version of the unit specification.
Additional Comments Please indicate below if there is any additional information not captured above, e.g. specific co-taught information, etc.
|
Assessment Marking Criteria Rubric- This is how your work will be graded. You will receive an overall grade that will be GUIDED by each of the criteria. The mark will fall into a 2, 5, or 8 range such as 72, 75, 78. This grade may be achieved by the demonstration of strengths in different areas. For example, a grade of 72 may be indicated by the highlighted sections on the rubric
Assessment descriptor | 0-19%
Very poor Fail (No) |
20-29%
Clear Fail (Little/poor) |
30-39%
Marginal Fail (inadequate/ limited) |
40-49%
Third (Adequate/ acceptable) |
50-59%
2.2 (Good) |
60-69%
2.1 (Very good) |
70-85%
First (Excellent) |
86-100
Outstanding |
portfolio: presentation / structure
(20%) |
Your portfolio is unstructured, has no creativity and many issues with format. | Your portfolio is unstructured and has confusing format | Your portfolio is poorly constructed, lacks creativity and the format is inappropriate. | There are many areas of your portfolio that require improvement in terms of structure, creativity and format. | There are some areas of your portfolio in terms of structure, creativity and format which could be improved. | Your portfolio demonstrates a clear structure with elements of creativity and professionalism. | Your portfolio is very clear, well-structured and creative. | Your portfolio is very clear, well-structured, creative, and with a highly professional format |
Extremely poor spelling, language, grammar and syntax. Many writing errors which affect clarity and readability. | Very poor spelling, language, grammar and syntax. Many writing errors which affect readability. | Poor spelling, language, grammar and syntax. Insufficient information and inadequate application. Issues with layout/readability. | Whilst improved there are still issues with spelling, language, grammar and syntax. information and your application of the content. | Good, although there are still some issues with spelling, language, grammar and syntax throughout. | Very good use of spelling, language, grammar and syntax throughout. | Excellent use of spelling, language, grammar and syntax throughout. | Outstanding with clearly developed articulation of spelling, language, grammar and syntax. | |
Fitness of CV & LinkedIn Profile for Professional use
(15%) |
The CV is missing. | The CV is very confused, poorly laid out; not updated since university entry. | Skeletal CV is included but not appropriate / not updated to include university experience. | CV is basic and with acceptable layout, but needs development. CV identifies strengths. | CV has a clear layout, some room for improvement. CV identifies and contextualises strengths. | Very good CV – Clear and attractive layout. CV identifies and evidences strengths and areas for development (unrealised strengths) | Professional CV layout. CV identifies and evidences strengths and areas for development (unrealised strengths) and links them to professional opportunities | Outstanding CV. Professional CV layout. CV identifies and evidences strengths and areas for development (unrealised strengths) and links them to professional opportunities seamlessly. |
Both content and presentation need very substantial work. Cannot be used outside the university. | Both content and presentation still need considerable work. Should not be used outside the university. | Not yet ready for professional use within the university. Needs substantial work to achieve a professional level. | Acceptable for internal use as a university assessment. Needs more development for professional level. | Acceptable as a university document. With further work will be suitable for professional level use. | Suitable to seek summer job, internship or placement. | Placement quality, this is ready to seek a placement. | Professional quality CV; fully ready for job search. | |
No Linkedin Profile | Linkedin Profile is created with no context. | Linkedin profile is created with some areas populated but not a coherent profile. | Linkedin profile is well populated in some areas, no introduction, few or no connections, , key strengths listed, some information on education / work and voluntary experience | Linkedin profile is well populated in some areas, with a brief introduction, few connections, evidence of engagement with Business related content, key strengths listed, some information on education / work and voluntary experience | Linkedin profile is well populated in most areas, with a good introduction which outlined the purpose of the profile, some of connections, evidence of engagement with Business related content, key strengths listed, clear information on education / work and voluntary experience, | Linkedin profile is well populated in most areas, with a photograph, with a good introduction which outlined the purpose of the profile, a number of connections, evidence of engagement with Business related content, key strengths listed, clear information on education / work and voluntary experience, | Linkedin profile is fully populated in most areas. A photograph, good introduction which outlines purpose of the profile, a number of connections, evidence of active engagement with a variety of Business Related content, key strengths listed, clear information on education and work / voluntary experience .Accomplishments and additional information listed | |
PPD/CV Engagement | No evidence of engagement in the PDP process | Little evidence of engagement in the PDP process. | Inadequate evidence of engagement in the PDP process. | Adequate evidence of engagement in the PDP process. | Good evidence of engagement in the PDP process | Very good evidence of engagement in the PDP process. | Excellent evidence of engagement in the PDP process. | Outstanding evidence of engagement in the PDP process. |
Identify and evidence
awareness of key personal skills, values and aspirations (15%) |
No evidence of your ability to articulate thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | Little evidence of your ability to articulate thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | Shows limited ability to articulate thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | You have shown some ability to articulate your thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | You have demonstrated your ability to articulate your thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | You have shown astute ability to articulate your thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | You have shown a sophisticated level of ability to articulate your thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements | You are showing an exceptional level of ability to articulate your thoughts, emotions, goals and achievements |
Critical and reflective exploration of self-development
(20%) |
No evidence of any exploration of critique of self-development. | Little exploration of critique of self-development. | Insufficient/ineffective exploration of critique of self-development. | Acceptable exploration of critique of self-development. | Good exploration of critique of self-development. | Very good exploration of critique of self-development. | An extensive exploration of critique of self-development. | Outstanding exploration of critique of self-development. |
No evidence of your ability to demonstrate critical and reflective awareness as necessary outcomes to measure personal development. | Little evidence of your ability to demonstrate critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development. | Inadequate evidence of your ability to demonstrate critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development. | Adequate demonstration of critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development. | Good demonstration of critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development. | Very good demonstration of critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development | Excellent demonstration of critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development | Outstanding demonstration of critical and reflective thinking as necessary outcomes to measure personal development | |
No articulation of personal goals. | Poor articulation of personal goals. | Inadequate articulation of personal goals. | Some articulation of personal goals | Articulation of personal goals is good. | Articulation of personal goals is very good. | Articulation of personal goals is excellent. | Articulation of personal goals is outstanding | |
No reflection which articulates engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates personal development. | The reflection articulates little engagement with the PPD process, little personal development. | The reflection articulates little engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates minimal personal development | The reflection articulates an acceptable level of engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates some personal development | The reflection articulates a good level of engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates your personal development. | The reflection articulates considerable engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates good personal development. | The reflection articulates significant engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates very good engagement with your personal development. | The reflection articulates substantial engagement with the PPD process and demonstrates your outstanding commitment to your personal development. | |
No information from relevant academic or professional sources. | Very little information from relevant academic or professional sources. But those chosen may be of limited relevance to the PPD process, the learning experience and the critical reflection. | Little information from relevant academic or professional sources. But those chosen may be of limited relevance to the PPD process, the learning experience and the critical reflection. | Some attempt to use information from academic or professional sources. But those chosen may be of limited relevance to the PPD process, the learning experience and the critical reflection. | Information from relevant sources used lacks analysis, although does bring insight to the PPD process, the learning experience and critical reflective analysis. | Information from academic sources is collected, analysed, interpreted and applied. Bringing some understanding the PPD process, the learning experience and critical reflection. | Information from academic sources is collected, analysed, interpreted and applied. Developing an enhanced understanding the PPD process, your learning experience and development of your critical reflection skills. | Outstanding information from relevant academic sources which is both interpreted and applied, bringing insight to
the PPD process, the learning experience and enhancing your critical reflection. |
|
No attempt at any form of referencing system (as appropriate). | No application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Major issues with MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Some attempt at applying MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). Although some further work is required on this. | Good attempt at applying MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Very good application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Excellent application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Outstanding application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | |
Exploring digital footprint and developing e-professionalism
(20%) |
No attempt at any form of referencing system (as appropriate). | No application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Major issues with MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Some attempt at applying MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). Although some further work is required on this. | Good attempt at applying MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Very good application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Excellent application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). | Outstanding application of MMU Harvard reference system (as appropriate). |
No information from relevant academic or professional sources. | Very little information from relevant academic or professional sources. But those chosen may be of limited relevance to the digital footprint and e-professionalism the learning experience and the critical reflection. | Little information from relevant academic or professional sources. But those chosen may be of limited relevance to the digital footprint and e-professionalism, the learning experience and the critical reflection. | Some attempt to use information from academic or professional sources. But those chosen may be of limited relevance to digital footprint and the learning experience and the critical reflection. | Information from relevant sources used lacks analysis, although does bring insight to e-professionalism, the learning experience and critical reflective analysis. | Information from academic sources is collected, analysed, interpreted and applied. Bringing some understanding to e-professionalism, the learning experience and critical reflection. | Information from academic sources is collected, analysed, interpreted and applied. Developing an enhanced understanding the digital footprint and e-professionalism your learning experience and development of your critical reflection skills. | Outstanding information from relevant academic sources which is both interpreted and applied, bringing insight to
The digital footprint and e-professionalism, the learning experience and enhancing your critical reflection. |
|
No reflection which articulates engagement with e-professionalism development process. | The reflection articulates little engagement with e-professionalism, little digital footprint development. | The reflection articulates little engagement with e-professionalism and demonstrates minimal development of their digital footprint | The reflection articulates an acceptable level of engagement with e-professionalism and demonstrates some development of their digital footprint. | The reflection articulates a good level of engagement with e-professionalism and demonstrates digital footprint development | The reflection articulates considerable engagement with the e-professionalism and demonstrates good development of their digital footprint. | The reflection articulates significant engagement with e-professionalism and demonstrates very good engagement with developing their digital footprint | The reflection articulates substantial engagement with e-professionalism and demonstrates your outstanding commitment to developing their digital footprint. | |
No evidence of any exploration of e-professionalism | Little exploration of critique of self-development. | Insufficient/ineffective exploration of critique of self-development. | Acceptable exploration of e-professionalism | Good exploration of critique of e-professionalism | Very good exploration of e-professionalism | An extensive exploration of e-professionalism | Outstanding exploration of e-professionalism | |
Action Plan
(10%) |
No realistic action plan identified.
|
Very limited action plan identified | Limited action plan identified | Acceptable action plan identified | Appropriate action plan identified | Good action plan for next year. | Excellent clear action plan for next year. | Outstanding and detailed action plan for next year. |
Step Marking
Mark | UG Classification |
95 – 100% | Outstanding |
90% | Very High First |
85% | High First |
80% | Mid First |
75% | Low First |
72% | Marginal First |
68% | High 2.1 |
65% | Mid 2.1 |
62% | Low 2.1 |
58% | High 2.2 |
55% | Mid 2.2 |
52% | Low 2.2 |
48% | High third |
45% | Mid third |
42% | Low third |
38% | Marginal Fail |
35% | |
32% | |
28% | Clear Fail |
25% | |
22% | |
18% | Very poor Fail |
15% | |
12% | |
8% | |
5% | |
2% | |
0% | Non |