Showing 244–252 of 475 results

  • Should Animals be used for Research?

    $20.00

    Write a brief outline of your mid-term research paper. This should include the title of your paper, thesis statement with a clear plan of development, three sub-ideas, supporting details and a comment for conclusion. This outline may be modified later.

    Mention ideas in brief. You need not write complete sentences.

    Title: Should Animals be Used for Research ?

    Introduction: Using animals for research prepuces is a debatable subject . In which many have taken different sides of that matter, between those who are in favor and those who are against.

    Thesis statement with plan of development- nevertheless, animal testing have served the man kind in many ways by inventing treatments for serious illnesses, improved new development in medicine world, and increased the production of new products.

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    First body paragraph:

    Testing animals have invented many treatment for serious illness.

    First sub-idea- Animals studies have done a major role in medical research field and the key of basic knowledge in biology.

    Supporting details- . “Between 17 million and 22 million animals are estimated to be ..”

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    Second body paragraph:

    Animal testing has played a vital role in virtually every major medical advance.

    Supporting details- Second sub-idea Using animals for research have a crucial part in medical research paper As stated by Animal testing and medicine journal In the the twentieth century animal testing have became essential when a company in the united state invented Sulfanilamide ..

    _____________________________________________________________________________

    Third body paragraph:

    Third sub-idea -_____Animal testing have been a debatable matter. In between those who agree and disagree. __________________________________________________________

    Supporting details- ______________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    Conclusion: To conclude, the researches and medical testing on animals take big place in human health.

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    Mention all the sources you will use for your research. Write the type of each source (whether it is a book, a journal article or a webpage), its title, its author and the date of its publication.

    Source 1:

    1.Title: Use of laboratory animals in biomedical and behavioural research.

    1. Type: Online Book. (eEbook)
    2. Author(s):
    3. Date of publication: Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Company. 2012______________________________________________________________________________

    Source 2:

    1.Title: Animal Testing and Medicine.

    Type: Article

    1. Author(s): Hajar, Rachel1
    2. Date of publication: Heart Views. Jan-Mar2011, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p42-42. 1p._________________________________________________________________________

    Source 3:

    1.Title:*ANIMAL experimentation

    *ANIMAL models in research

    1. Type: article
    1. (Animals 2.0)
    2. Authors (KOPP, SUSAN & CAMOSY & CHARLES)
    3. Date of publication: (2015)

    ______________________________________________________________________________

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    by EssayShark Tutors
    Download File

  • Students with Learning Difficulties

    $20.00

    Investigate Government authorised (e.g. UK Government: Education) websites plus other publically available information produced by Departments of Education or Ministries of Education websites in United Kingdom to answer:

    1. How students with learning difficulties/learning disabilities are identified, defined and characterised;
    2. The stated prevalence rates of these learners within schools;

    3a. the recommendations offered by these authorities to assist schools to improve academic, social and mental wellness outcomes for students with learning difficulties/learning disabilities;

    3b. the validity of these recommendations as measured against current peer reviewed literature around best practices models of supporting school success for students with learning difficulties/learning disabilities;

    For 3b – I have supplied a variety of articles that you will need to read and refer to in your answer of 3b.

    Cite all sources and include urls where appropriate – aim for at least 15 sources

    Assignment Parameters

    1. Official UK Government or UK Education Department websites only. What you are trying gather is information from regulatory bodies around this area. In short, what information /programs /provisions do they provide to schools to help them support these students?
    2. Any search engine is acceptable
    3. Terminology usage. Learning difficulty or Learning disability? These terms can be used poorly, inconsistently or categorically in the literature. Be accurate with the use of terminology for UK;
    4. Peer reviewed journal articles sourced from 2004-date only
    5. 15 or more cited sources per group investigation (i.e. websites and journal articles
    by EssayShark Tutors
    Download File

  • Yearlong Curriculum: grade 5

    $2.00

    Create a year long curriculum using the document. Pick a grade level between k-6 the theme you choose should somehow relate to the concepts. Please use the NC standards when choosing concepts for your grade level. There should be a different theme each grading period

    Pages: 1, double spaced

    by EssayShark Tutors
    Download File

  • Psychological disorder (Depression) and Therapy

    $10.00

    Choose any of the following disorders: Major Depression, Schizophrenia, Eating Disorders, or any personality disorder. Then write about how each of the following perspectives would treat the disorder: Cognitive, Behavioral, Psychodynamic and Humanistic/Existential. You should define the disorder, then write a minimum of one paragraph describing and utilizing concepts from the notes and text on how each perspective would treat that disorder. Each paragraph should include concepts and terms from the theoretical orientation.

    This assignment should be a minimum of 3 pages, typed, APA style.

    by EssayShark Tutors
    Download File

  • WR100 SB2: Childhood Memories Essay

    $10.00

    Childhood Memories Essay

    Imitation of Three Sections in Another Bullshit Night in Suck City

    Pages: 4, double spaced

    Download File

  • Psych/550: Simple Stimulus Paper

    $5.00

    PSYCH 550 Week 2 Individual Assignment Simple Stimulus Learning Paper

    Prepare a 750 to 1,400-word paper in which you analyze forms of simple stimulus learning. As a part of your analysis, be sure to address the following items:

    • Explain the concept of habituation.
    • Analyze the factors that affect perceptual learning.
    • Examine the effects of stimulus exposure.
    • Discuss the application of simple stimulus learning to at least two real life situations.
    Download File

  • A New Dualism in Environmental Ethics – n-c dualism

    $10.00

    PHIL 1165: Moral and Social Problems in Healthcare Final Paper

    Format and Submission
    Length: 1600-2000 words
    Spacing: Single or Double
    Font size: 11-12

    Assignment
    The final paper assignment requires you to engage in substantive philosophical research and defend a philosophical thesis. You may choose any topic in the area of Bioethics. If you choose a topic that was already covered in class, you must engage critically with at least one academic, philosophical reading that was not covered in class.

    Requirements
    The main requirement of this assignment is that you defend your own view about some philosophical issue while at the same time charitably but critically engaging with arguments defending some alternative.
    Every paper should have the following components:

    1. Introduction
    The introduction of your paper should be succinct but accomplish the following:

    1. Provide context for the thesis under discussion. Why is the thesis you are defending important or relevant? Why should a reader care to hear about the defense of a thesis on your topic?
    2. Introduce the reader to your thesis. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should know what precisely will be defended in the paper.
    3. Introduce the reader to the structure of the paper. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should have an idea of how the paper will be structured. In doing so, you will also be introducing the reader to what ideas/theses you’ll be arguing against in the paper since you can’t spell out the structure without mentioning that you’ll be engaging critically with alternative views.

    2. Conclusion
    The conclusion of your paper should succinctly sum up what you have accomplished in your paper.

    3. Exegesis of dissenting view(s)
    These papers require you to critically engage with arguments for theses that are inconsistent with your own. Before explaining what is wrong with any view, you must precisely, concisely, and charitably explain those arguments.

    4. Critical evaluation of dissenting view(s)
    Once you have fairly explained the alternatives to your own view, you must critically evaluate them using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence)

    5. Works cited
    Choose a professional format that you like. If you have no preference, I would choose something like (Author Date) with full entries in the bibliography. I recommend that you use a tool like Zotero or Endnote for building bibliographies and for citing sources.

    6. Thesis defense
    You must provide a substantive, cogent defense of your own view using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence).

    7. Title
    Your paper should have a descriptive and professional sounding title.

    8. Section headings
    Your paper should be divided into distinct sections with useful section titles.
    Potential Topics
    1. ELT Distribution

    • Organ Transplantation Policy
    • Organ Donation Ethics
    • What Counts a Disease
    • Voluntary Health-Risk Behavior

    2. Reproduction Ethics

    • Commercial Surrogacy
    • Parental Licensing
    • Abortion
    • Moral Status of the Fetus
    • Fatherhood and Abortion Decisions
    • Choosing Children

    3. Biomedical Enhancement and Cloning

    • PEDs and Sports
    • Cognitive Enhancement
    • Moral Enhancement
    • Cloning for Organs

    4. Research Ethics

    • Animal experimentation
    • Human Experimentation
    • Economic Justice and Experimentation
    • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals

    5. Healthcare Policy

    • Universal Healthcare
    • Obligations to the Worst-Off and Justice

    6. Personal Health Decisions

    • Active vs. Passive
    • Physician Assisted Suicide
    • Genetic Screening

    7. Patient’s Rights

    • Informed Consent
    • Autonomy
    Download File

  • Practical Pragmatism: Solving The Problem Of Inconsequentialism

    $10.00

    PHIL 1165: Moral and Social Problems in Healthcare Final Paper

    Format and Submission
    Length: 1600-2000 words
    Spacing: Single or Double
    Font size: 11-12

    Assignment
    The final paper assignment requires you to engage in substantive philosophical research and defend a philosophical thesis. You may choose any topic in the area of Bioethics. If you choose a topic that was already covered in class, you must engage critically with at least one academic, philosophical reading that was not covered in class.

    Requirements
    The main requirement of this assignment is that you defend your own view about some philosophical issue while at the same time charitably but critically engaging with arguments defending some alternative.
    Every paper should have the following components:

    1. Introduction
    The introduction of your paper should be succinct but accomplish the following:

    1. Provide context for the thesis under discussion. Why is the thesis you are defending important or relevant? Why should a reader care to hear about the defense of a thesis on your topic?
    2. Introduce the reader to your thesis. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should know what precisely will be defended in the paper.
    3. Introduce the reader to the structure of the paper. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should have an idea of how the paper will be structured. In doing so, you will also be introducing the reader to what ideas/theses you’ll be arguing against in the paper since you can’t spell out the structure without mentioning that you’ll be engaging critically with alternative views.

    2. Conclusion
    The conclusion of your paper should succinctly sum up what you have accomplished in your paper.

    3. Exegesis of dissenting view(s)
    These papers require you to critically engage with arguments for theses that are inconsistent with your own. Before explaining what is wrong with any view, you must precisely, concisely, and charitably explain those arguments.

    4. Critical evaluation of dissenting view(s)
    Once you have fairly explained the alternatives to your own view, you must critically evaluate them using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence)

    5. Works cited
    Choose a professional format that you like. If you have no preference, I would choose something like (Author Date) with full entries in the bibliography. I recommend that you use a tool like Zotero or Endnote for building bibliographies and for citing sources.

    6. Thesis defense
    You must provide a substantive, cogent defense of your own view using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence).

    7. Title
    Your paper should have a descriptive and professional sounding title.

    8. Section headings
    Your paper should be divided into distinct sections with useful section titles.
    Potential Topics
    1. ELT Distribution

    • Organ Transplantation Policy
    • Organ Donation Ethics
    • What Counts a Disease
    • Voluntary Health-Risk Behavior

    2. Reproduction Ethics

    • Commercial Surrogacy
    • Parental Licensing
    • Abortion
    • Moral Status of the Fetus
    • Fatherhood and Abortion Decisions
    • Choosing Children

    3. Biomedical Enhancement and Cloning

    • PEDs and Sports
    • Cognitive Enhancement
    • Moral Enhancement
    • Cloning for Organs

    4. Research Ethics

    • Animal experimentation
    • Human Experimentation
    • Economic Justice and Experimentation
    • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals

    5. Healthcare Policy

    • Universal Healthcare
    • Obligations to the Worst-Off and Justice

    6. Personal Health Decisions

    • Active vs. Passive
    • Physician Assisted Suicide
    • Genetic Screening

    7. Patient’s Rights

    • Informed Consent
    • Autonomy
    Download File

  • CHILD SUPPORT: ARE FATHER’S MORALLY REQUIRED TO PAY?

    $10.00

    PHIL 1165: Moral and Social Problems in Healthcare Final Paper

    Format and Submission
    Length: 1600-2000 words
    Spacing: Single or Double
    Font size: 11-12

    Assignment
    The final paper assignment requires you to engage in substantive philosophical research and defend a philosophical thesis. You may choose any topic in the area of Bioethics. If you choose a topic that was already covered in class, you must engage critically with at least one academic, philosophical reading that was not covered in class.

    Requirements
    The main requirement of this assignment is that you defend your own view about some philosophical issue while at the same time charitably but critically engaging with arguments defending some alternative.
    Every paper should have the following components:

    1. Introduction
    The introduction of your paper should be succinct but accomplish the following:

    1. Provide context for the thesis under discussion. Why is the thesis you are defending important or relevant? Why should a reader care to hear about the defense of a thesis on your topic?
    2. Introduce the reader to your thesis. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should know what precisely will be defended in the paper.
    3. Introduce the reader to the structure of the paper. Upon reading the introduction, the reader should have an idea of how the paper will be structured. In doing so, you will also be introducing the reader to what ideas/theses you’ll be arguing against in the paper since you can’t spell out the structure without mentioning that you’ll be engaging critically with alternative views.

    2. Conclusion
    The conclusion of your paper should succinctly sum up what you have accomplished in your paper.

    3. Exegesis of dissenting view(s)
    These papers require you to critically engage with arguments for theses that are inconsistent with your own. Before explaining what is wrong with any view, you must precisely, concisely, and charitably explain those arguments.

    4. Critical evaluation of dissenting view(s)
    Once you have fairly explained the alternatives to your own view, you must critically evaluate them using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence)

    5. Works cited
    Choose a professional format that you like. If you have no preference, I would choose something like (Author Date) with full entries in the bibliography. I recommend that you use a tool like Zotero or Endnote for building bibliographies and for citing sources.

    6. Thesis defense
    You must provide a substantive, cogent defense of your own view using the tools of philosophy (analysis, arguments, reasons, evidence).

    7. Title
    Your paper should have a descriptive and professional sounding title.

    8. Section headings
    Your paper should be divided into distinct sections with useful section titles.
    Potential Topics
    1. ELT Distribution

    • Organ Transplantation Policy
    • Organ Donation Ethics
    • What Counts a Disease
    • Voluntary Health-Risk Behavior

    2. Reproduction Ethics

    • Commercial Surrogacy
    • Parental Licensing
    • Abortion
    • Moral Status of the Fetus
    • Fatherhood and Abortion Decisions
    • Choosing Children

    3. Biomedical Enhancement and Cloning

    • PEDs and Sports
    • Cognitive Enhancement
    • Moral Enhancement
    • Cloning for Organs

    4. Research Ethics

    • Animal experimentation
    • Human Experimentation
    • Economic Justice and Experimentation
    • Regulation of Pharmaceuticals

    5. Healthcare Policy

    • Universal Healthcare
    • Obligations to the Worst-Off and Justice

    6. Personal Health Decisions

    • Active vs. Passive
    • Physician Assisted Suicide
    • Genetic Screening

    7. Patient’s Rights

    • Informed Consent
    • Autonomy
    Download File