Showing 1351–1359 of 1959 results

  • Week 4 Facility Planning Floor Plan

    $7.50

    HCS 446 Week 4 Facility Planning Floor Plan

    Read the following information:
    Health care facilities are unique and have clearly defined characteristics based on the needs of the facility or population being served. Poor design may lead to staff, visitor, or patient stress. In large facilities, inability to find a department may lead to frustrations and disorientation for older patients. Poor layout may also lead to staff inefficiencies or fines because of failure to meet regulatory requirements.

    Resource: Facility Planning – Part III on the student Website
    Download the SmartDraw Healthcare software located on your student Website in Week Four. Complete a floor plan of the facilitythat you selected. Select one of the following facilities and obtain approval from your faculty regarding this choice. Indicate if this will be a new facility or the renovation of an existing structure. If it is a new or existing structure, also explain why the renovation or new facility is needed.

    • An ambulatory care clinic
    • A clinic within a hospital, such as an emergency room, surgical center, or an OB unit
    • A family clinic
    • An outpatient clinic
    • A long-term care facility

    Choose the template you want to use and it will then open in the SmartDraw software. From that point, you will be able to modify the template and add the information listed below. Once you have completed the floor plan and you are still in the SmartDraw software, save it as a Word .doc file. This will keep the file size small and you may post the file in your appropriate course folder.

    Using your SmartDraw floor plan, focus on the following environmental design elements:

    • The healthcare structure
    • Diagnostic and treatment space equipment and location
    • Customer service and amenities, such as the reception desk, bathroom, shower, vending machine, and so forth
    • Clinical support areas, such as nurse’s station, charting areas, and so forth
    • Physician or dentist office space for patient consultation
    • Administrative offices
    • Building support, such as laundry, generator facilities, housekeeping, and so forth
    • Mechanical equipment, such as space for laboratory equipment, radiology equipment, gases such as oxygen, and suctions
    • Color and noise elements
    • Regulatory elements such as Occupational Safety and Health Administration and ADA guidelines
    • Other elements such as IT or creative healing environmental ideas

    Write a 350- to 700-word summary that includes the following information:

    • Reason you selected the floor plan you designed
    • Any recommendations or suggestions for completing your floor plan differently – what would you do differently next time?
    • Something that you learned from doing this process and completing your own floor plan
  • HCS 446 week 3 Facility Planning Part II

    $20.00

    Resource: Facility Planning – Part II located on the student Website
    Writea 1,050- to 1,450-word paper that includes the following elements:
    Regulatory requirements and their effect on the design and equipment
    Color selection implications and noise issues
    List of the type of equipment needed
    Electronic items needed
    Examination of budget planning and cost estimates
    Description of the role of stakeholders in facility planning and development

  • HCS 446 Week 1 Facility Planning Part 1 (Virtua’s new ambulatory care clinic)

    $12.50

    Research health care facilities in your area that are either new or are being renovated. Your research will help you select your project focus. Your selections are limited to an ambulatory care clinic; a clinic within a hospital, such as an emergency room, surgical center, or an OB unit; a family clinic, an outpatient clinic, or a long-term care facility.

    Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper in which you describe your selected facility. Include the following elements in your paper:

    Community or facility need for the building or renovation
    Type of population you are serving
    Description of the facility you have selected

  • Checkpoint: Project-Wide or Objective-Oriented Evaluations

    $5.00

    HSM270 Week 4 CheckPoint

    Checkpoint: Project-Wide or Objective-Oriented Evaluations

    • Provide a brief summary of your selected program from Appendix B and discuss whether you would use a project-wide evaluation plan or an objective-oriented evaluation plan.
    • Explain the reasoning behind your choice and why you preferred one plan over the other.

    Post your response in 200 to 300 words in Assignments in the Gradebook.

  • Assignment: Program Planning and Evaluation Paper

    $12.50

    HSM 270 Program Planning and Evaluation Paper

    Assignment: Program Planning and Evaluation Paper

    • Read all of the fictional program scenarios in Appendix B and choose one to work with throughout the course.
    • Compare program planning with program evaluation in human services organizations. Describe how the two components are related.
    • Identify’ specific examples of how program planning and evaluation interrelate in your chosen scenario in Appendix B.
    • Identify technical and political aspects of program planning and evaluation you might encounter in the program scenario you chose, and explain how these aspects could affect your planning and evaluation process.

    Write a 700- to 1,050-word, APA-formatted paper that addresses the above issues.
    Format your paper according to APA guidelines.
    Post your paper in the Assignments link in the Gradebook.

  • Assignment: Steps to Writing a Grant Proposal

    $17.50

    HSM 270 Week 3 Assignment: Steps to Writing a Grant Proposal

    Assignment: Steps to Writing a Grant Proposal

    • Summarize the steps to writing a grant proposal for the scenario you chose from Appendix B:
    • Outline the grant proposal writing process from beginning to end.
    • Create a needs and problem statement for the scenario.
    • Ensure the summary consists of 1.050 to 1,700 words and is in paragraph form.
  • Checkpoint: Grant Proposals

    $5.00

    HSM270 Week 3 Assignment: Grant Proposals

    Checkpoint: Grant Proposals
    Describe the general attributes of a grant proposal. Be sure to address the function of a grant proposal, the purpose of a grant proposal, and how a grant proposal relates to a program plan.
    Post your response in 200 to 300 words in the Assignments section of the Gradebook

  • COMM 100W – Writing for Influence: Effects of Smoking Cigarettes

    $12.50

    The Fact Paper

    In this paper, you will describe a person, object, or event using only verifiable facts, making sure to eliminate ALL words that are subjective. Subjective words are words that derive their (different) meanings, based on the experience of the perceiver. In other words, these have different definitions depending on each person you ask; e.g., honor, big, skinny, lots, delicious, bright, challenging, etc., are all subjective words. In contrast to saying, “My mother is short,” (which is subjective), you could say, “My mother is five feet tall.” As you can imagine then, you paper will make extensive use of citations, since you’ll need to cite every fact in your paper that is not “common knowledge.”

    The objective of the paper is to convince your reader to see the person, object, or event in either a positive or negative light while ensuring that your paper remains completely free of any subjective language. You paper should be at least 4 – 5 buzzwords in length.

    Instructions

    Choose a person, object, or event that you find interesting and that you can readily research. It is better if you choose a topic about which many people already have a strong opinion (that differs from your own). For instance, many people like chocolate ice cream, but perhaps you hate chocolate ice cream. If so, chocolate ice cream would make a good topic for this paper.

    After you choose a topic, begin to compile facts about your topic that will help you to show your topic in either a negative or positive light. To show chocolate ice cream in a negative light, for instance, you might look for a medical study that links chocolate ice cream to mad cow disease, or find evidence that an unpopular person such as Richard Nixon ate chocolate ice cream every day. Likewise, if you find a report concluding that chocolate ice cream cures pancreatic cancer, it may be wise to omit those findings from your paper. Either way, you want to provide only verifiable (factual) information about chocolate ice cream. At no point should you disclose to your reader your own opinion of chocolate ice cream, as this would constitute OPINION (subjectivity), and NOT FACT. In other words, persuade us to dislike chocolate ice cream merely by providing negative information about it that you have strategically organized (remember arrangement) to maximize persuasive effect.

    ** Remember, in addition to the instructions stated supra, you may not include VALUE language of any kind; e.g., language that suggests your opinion, or is defined in relative (subjective) terms.

    Other requirements:

    1) Your opening sentence, since it cannot be an opinion sentence, must be either: (1) A quote of someone else’s opinion (in this case, subjective language is OK, because, since you are quoting it, it becomes verifiable (factual); or (2) (a vivid, powerful description of the topic of your paper in neutral objective terms (this vivid description substitutes for the OPINION sentence under the O-T-R model of writing). If your topic is algae and you wish to present algae in a positive light, then you could, for instance, write an engaging description of algae, or include a quote on algae that includes someone’s else’s opinion. Keep in mind, though, your opening description must also be free of any evaluative or opinionated language.

    2) The introduction of your paper must include a preview of the paper. Your preview should give your reader a sense of the main points you will cover about your topic (remember buzzwords).

    3) The body of your paper should deliver on the promises made in your preview, and each section of the body should begin with a preview of that section (think major transition sentences). For instance, if you promise in your introduction that the first section of your paper will provide information about deaths that have occurred on rides at Disneyland, then the first section of your paper should provide information about a number of deaths that have occurred on rides at Disneyland. AND, the first sentence of that section should preview which deaths on which rides will be discussed. AND, the first sentence of each paragraph should preview the specific deaths or rides discussed in that paragraph. For instance, the first sentence of your paragraph on the Matterhorn might read like so: No fewer than nine people have died while riding the Matterhorn.

    4) Your paper should feature a conclusion that follows the 3-part conclusion format discussed in class. Without drawing conclusions or stating your opinion, end the paper in such a way that your reader will be persuaded to adopt your perspective on the topic. (Link to vivid description, demonstrates connection of buzzword concepts, and relationship of topic to reader’s interest. All of these 3 components, however, must be accomplished using nothing but FACTS alone).

    Peer Reviews

    This assignment also provides for the possibility of an extra credit peer review. The same instructions apply as last time, inasmuch as you will put your fact paper in both the rough draft drop box, as well as in a drop box particularly designed for peer reviews. If you place your paper in the peer review participation drop box, YOU ARE AGREEING TO PROVIDE YOUR PARTNER WITH A PEER REVEW. If you fail to conduct that review (notwithstanding that you signed up for it), you will be prevented from participating in all future extra credit opportunities. Please see the Word document (peer review instructions) that we used for the spelunkers, and apply the same principles to the fact paper. Please note, there are a different set of peer review questions for the fact paper than there were for the spelunkers essay.

    Formatting requirements

    Full APA requirements.

    Grading

    When grading your paper, I will be looking for the following:

    1) All the tools graded in The Case of the Spelunkers (arrangement, Topic/Audience/Purpose consideration;

    2) The absence of evaluative words that cannot be empirically verified (Note: if there are more than five such words in your paper, you will lose two points for each additional word);

    3) Successful arrangement of your facts according to themes and strategic organization of information for persuasive effect (think photo essay—what story is my arrangement telling);

    4) Successful presentation of your topic in either a negative or positive light;

    5) The use of well-researched, peer reviewed sources (no less than five) from SJSU King Library’s Electronic Databases, that establish credibility; and

    6) Adherence to the formatting guidelines detailed above, including complete and correct citations for ALL of your facts and sources.

  • Categories of ADR (alternative dispute resolution)

    $10.00

    Write a 2-3 page, typed, double space paper on Means of Dispute Settlement.
    Discuss the various categories of ADR (alternative dispute resolution) and alternative and rank them in the order of values as you perceive them and explain why. What types of business disputes would best be handled by ADR? Why?